It should also be noted that about 1/2 of the voter fraud cases of the 2016 election were dismissed by the courts for Lack of Standing. I am not an attorney so my layman’s understanding is that “The Court” decided the person(s) bringing the suit forward were not the injured party. Huh! I guess the voter or voter’s representative was not injured in voter fraud. Also there were some cases dismissed b/c the court determined that the voter fraud being alleged should have been brought before the court prior to the offense… that is why some organizations did have lawsuits filed prior to the 2024 election. Attorneys can you add or clarify?
Although fraud deniers cite cases of fraud being denied as evidence that no fraud occurred, that's typical liberal bovine effluent. A case that was dismissed because of a lack of standing does not indicate that the case had no merit. It only indicates, as you have stated, that the plaintiff wasn't an injured party. In my non-attorney opinion, every American is an injured party owing to the policies of the Biden administration. Of course, that position doesn't hold any water in a court. Regarding your last point, we'll need an attorney to explain how a lawsuit alleging an illegal act can be filed before the act is committed.
Stop asking questions, Dave. Just move along, nothing to see here..
Good advice. I'll put a tooth under my pillow tonight and see if the tooth fairy leaves me a ballot recount.
Lucy, you got some splaining to do
Maybe all of the missing voters were jab-killed. I suspect more D's than R's got/get jabs. 💉💉💉
It should also be noted that about 1/2 of the voter fraud cases of the 2016 election were dismissed by the courts for Lack of Standing. I am not an attorney so my layman’s understanding is that “The Court” decided the person(s) bringing the suit forward were not the injured party. Huh! I guess the voter or voter’s representative was not injured in voter fraud. Also there were some cases dismissed b/c the court determined that the voter fraud being alleged should have been brought before the court prior to the offense… that is why some organizations did have lawsuits filed prior to the 2024 election. Attorneys can you add or clarify?
Although fraud deniers cite cases of fraud being denied as evidence that no fraud occurred, that's typical liberal bovine effluent. A case that was dismissed because of a lack of standing does not indicate that the case had no merit. It only indicates, as you have stated, that the plaintiff wasn't an injured party. In my non-attorney opinion, every American is an injured party owing to the policies of the Biden administration. Of course, that position doesn't hold any water in a court. Regarding your last point, we'll need an attorney to explain how a lawsuit alleging an illegal act can be filed before the act is committed.