In 1774, faced with increasingly defiant colonies, Great Britain passed a series of punitive laws which, along with the Quebec Act would become known as the Intolerable Acts or Coercive Acts. The acts consisted of the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act.
Unfettered immigration is clearly the policy of the global elites. I have yet to see a convincing argument that explains why. What exactly is the goal? Cheap labor? Erosion of the nation-state? The first seems too narrow, the last too broad. What is incontrovertible is that those at the top of western societies want it to continue. Both their messaging and efforts on the ground confirm this. But why? What do they really hope to achieve?
We will likely have an election in Canada sometime in the next year and the Conservatives look like they'll oust the Liberals (plenty of time to blow it) so we may be able to put your theory to the test. As for why? I just don't know.
I was watching a video accompanying an excerpt from one of Thomas Sowell's books on slavery. He wrote that countries historically captured one another's members as slaves. It was the rise of strong nation-states that helped stomp out the practice. It was a fascinating observation (one of many from him.) The preoccupation of all the West in bringing in large swaths of people is intended to replace the nation-state with the bureaucratic state. When chaos is achieved, most people will beg to be put into a 15-minute city. Two years ago, an architecture newsletter highlighted a prize-winning plan for a self-sustaining apartment building where the occupants would 'work on the garden.' Such gardens would be essential for the food shortages. That it captured a prize told me many of the conspiracy theories were true.
Thanks for the comment. Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite writers. There are some good reasons for immigration but the purpose of mass immigration escapes me. Unless it's seen as a mean to get more votes for your party.
Unfettered immigration is clearly the policy of the global elites. I have yet to see a convincing argument that explains why. What exactly is the goal? Cheap labor? Erosion of the nation-state? The first seems too narrow, the last too broad. What is incontrovertible is that those at the top of western societies want it to continue. Both their messaging and efforts on the ground confirm this. But why? What do they really hope to achieve?
We will likely have an election in Canada sometime in the next year and the Conservatives look like they'll oust the Liberals (plenty of time to blow it) so we may be able to put your theory to the test. As for why? I just don't know.
I was watching a video accompanying an excerpt from one of Thomas Sowell's books on slavery. He wrote that countries historically captured one another's members as slaves. It was the rise of strong nation-states that helped stomp out the practice. It was a fascinating observation (one of many from him.) The preoccupation of all the West in bringing in large swaths of people is intended to replace the nation-state with the bureaucratic state. When chaos is achieved, most people will beg to be put into a 15-minute city. Two years ago, an architecture newsletter highlighted a prize-winning plan for a self-sustaining apartment building where the occupants would 'work on the garden.' Such gardens would be essential for the food shortages. That it captured a prize told me many of the conspiracy theories were true.
Thanks for the comment. Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite writers. There are some good reasons for immigration but the purpose of mass immigration escapes me. Unless it's seen as a mean to get more votes for your party.