Noted psychiatrist, Dr. Breggins, wrote a column with some sympathy for her because of the number of medications she was taking. I like Dr. Breggins, and the problem of psych drugs is real, but I pushed back. If anyone knew the problem of taking so many meds, it was a nurse working in a hospital. This is very different from someone taking psych meds, hallucinating, and killing a loved one. Writers like Simone de Beauvoir gave us the notion that women were a social construct. Add to it the toxicity of Cultural Marxists, like Herbert Marcuse, repeating this verbiage but adding that the fake feminine traits would prove useful to the revolution, and voila, you have women celebrating the murder of children just like they celebrated a CEO being murdered by a handsome, well-off dude or Charlie Kirk being murdered. Jordan Peterson pondered what society will look like with women's emotions unhinged. It is a chilling notion. The other day I saw a youngish guy walking in a neighborhood with no shirt, big muscles, visibly agitated and sweaty. I was glad the streets were empty. As a society, we know that such physicality can frame one's house, dig a ditch, or strike you down with a blow. Thus, men are shaped to constrain their ability to use physicality as they might otherwise wish. Right now, women are encouraged to use their emotions and verbal skills without constraint. I am glad more women are recognizing the danger of such women. We need to call out such sickness - not embrace it as an act of herocism.
If this is what he said it's outrageous. Two antipsychotics were at therapeutic levels in her bloodstream. Plus SSRIs can only push someone over the edge when a mental illness was present to begin with. There is zero indication that was the case. A better case could be made for possession than anything else.
He did. And that is why I pushed back despite my admiration for him as was early on the scene about the Covid lockdown lunacy. As to the SSRIs, a doctor friend interviewed a few people who started hallucinating after being given SSRIs. I pushed for LA City council to ban homeless encampments near schools arguing that he kids might present as goblins to someone who is high. Unfortunately we have council members who push back. It's lunacy.
He had a stroke and is elderly. I think my pushback worked. But, yes, toxic empathy is a real problem. A friend, who is from Poland, and I were discussing this issue. It's Christian compassion stripped from the two part system: go on sin no more. Which in updated translation means, get your shit together and stay off dark roads. Instead we encourage taking dark roads illuminating them in the form of excuses and enabling.
The "fuss" is about the disgusting grown women who showed up to support the victimhood of Clancy while also claiming their own victimhood. Yes, some men do kill their own children out of malice and spite, but I've never once seen other men showing up outside the courtroom to show their support for a man who murdered his own children.
I get your point. Society doesn't wring their hands in anguish when men do this, but somehow when a women does it, we do. Ironically, her supporters are pointing to something in our DNA that women shouldn't do this. But this would point to something unique in having XX chromosomes but how does that fit with women saying men dressed as women are actually women? No wonder a certain segment of women are insane.
Noted psychiatrist, Dr. Breggins, wrote a column with some sympathy for her because of the number of medications she was taking. I like Dr. Breggins, and the problem of psych drugs is real, but I pushed back. If anyone knew the problem of taking so many meds, it was a nurse working in a hospital. This is very different from someone taking psych meds, hallucinating, and killing a loved one. Writers like Simone de Beauvoir gave us the notion that women were a social construct. Add to it the toxicity of Cultural Marxists, like Herbert Marcuse, repeating this verbiage but adding that the fake feminine traits would prove useful to the revolution, and voila, you have women celebrating the murder of children just like they celebrated a CEO being murdered by a handsome, well-off dude or Charlie Kirk being murdered. Jordan Peterson pondered what society will look like with women's emotions unhinged. It is a chilling notion. The other day I saw a youngish guy walking in a neighborhood with no shirt, big muscles, visibly agitated and sweaty. I was glad the streets were empty. As a society, we know that such physicality can frame one's house, dig a ditch, or strike you down with a blow. Thus, men are shaped to constrain their ability to use physicality as they might otherwise wish. Right now, women are encouraged to use their emotions and verbal skills without constraint. I am glad more women are recognizing the danger of such women. We need to call out such sickness - not embrace it as an act of herocism.
If this is what he said it's outrageous. Two antipsychotics were at therapeutic levels in her bloodstream. Plus SSRIs can only push someone over the edge when a mental illness was present to begin with. There is zero indication that was the case. A better case could be made for possession than anything else.
He did. And that is why I pushed back despite my admiration for him as was early on the scene about the Covid lockdown lunacy. As to the SSRIs, a doctor friend interviewed a few people who started hallucinating after being given SSRIs. I pushed for LA City council to ban homeless encampments near schools arguing that he kids might present as goblins to someone who is high. Unfortunately we have council members who push back. It's lunacy.
We live in troubling times where toxic empathy shorts out people's ability to see reality.
He had a stroke and is elderly. I think my pushback worked. But, yes, toxic empathy is a real problem. A friend, who is from Poland, and I were discussing this issue. It's Christian compassion stripped from the two part system: go on sin no more. Which in updated translation means, get your shit together and stay off dark roads. Instead we encourage taking dark roads illuminating them in the form of excuses and enabling.
Men kill their kids all the time -- usually to get back at their mother because she wanted a divorce. Why all the fuss when a woman does it?
The "fuss" is about the disgusting grown women who showed up to support the victimhood of Clancy while also claiming their own victimhood. Yes, some men do kill their own children out of malice and spite, but I've never once seen other men showing up outside the courtroom to show their support for a man who murdered his own children.
Two of the female jurists showed up in pink today. They should have been dismissed immediately, but that's Massachusetts for you.
This makes me want to vomit.
I think that was his point - just with a dry sarcastic tone.
I'm assuming that you're being sarcastic?
But are there hordes of people coming out of the woodwork to *defend* those men, when they do that?
*That's* the story here.
I get your point. Society doesn't wring their hands in anguish when men do this, but somehow when a women does it, we do. Ironically, her supporters are pointing to something in our DNA that women shouldn't do this. But this would point to something unique in having XX chromosomes but how does that fit with women saying men dressed as women are actually women? No wonder a certain segment of women are insane.