Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James M.'s avatar

When I'm going to steer the conversation towards weighty and controversial topics, I have a kind of playbook I use.

https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/talking-to-the-other-side-a-brief

First, I ease into the conversation. If people immediately seem angry or uncomfortable I usually disengage. Then I ask sincere and thorough questions. I really want to know what my dialogue partners believe, and why. THEN I try to state one concrete objection. These days that's rather easy. Most people maintain political frames that are almost entirely incapable of integrating real and demonstrated problems: urban crime, transgender inmates, inflation and federal debt, etc. When I'm speaking to leftists I also try to emphasize my benevolence and sincerity - I don't hate anyone. I'm not a bigot. I simply have different policy ideas, and maybe different assumptions about human nature. That last effort (communicating my goodwill) is especially important for leftists. Too many of them operate with a heuristic that attributes anger or hostility or malign motives to everyone who disagrees with them. It's useful to remind them: yes, conservatives (traditionalists, libertarians, populists, etc.) might be angry with you for YOUR views... just as YOU are angry with them for theirs. If they are bigots, then you are too.

https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-the-bigoted-republican

Let's put all of that negative (and dehumanizing) labelling aside and talk about ideas. Let's talk about REALITY.

Expand full comment

No posts