SHOCKING: COVID-19 Vaccines Linked to Disturbing Autopsy Results - Stunning Lancet Study Removed Within 24 Hours
Discover more from Wrong Speak Publishing
SHOCKING: COVID-19 Vaccines Linked to Disturbing Autopsy Results - Stunning Lancet Study Removed Within 24 Hours
74% of participants died from taking at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
A recent Lancet study titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination” was removed from the SSRN website less than 24 hours after publication. The purpose of the 48-page study was to examine all COVID-19-related deaths and to report on the doctors’ findings. The key takeaway from this study? 74% of participants died from taking at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Thanks to the swift work of archivists, it can still be found in PDF form via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine.
The doctors involved in the publication were Nicolas Hulscher, BS; Paul E. Alexander, Ph.D.; Richard Amerling, MD; Heather Gessling, MD; Roger Hodkinson, MD; William Makis, MD; Harvey A. Risch, MD, Ph.D.; Mark Trozzi, MD; and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH.
Dr. McCullough went over the paper’s authors and their credentials with Jan Jekielek on Epoch Times TV’s American Thought Leaders earlier this month:
Jekielek asks Dr. McCullough what he feels is the true significance of the paper being pulled from circulation, to which he responds by saying:
“The CDC and the FDA, at this point and time, the official narrative is they still don’t see any evidence that deaths are linked to the vaccine. And they have begrudgingly acknowledged a few cases after the Jensen vaccine, for instance. So, the government narrative is still that people do not die after COVID-19 vaccination, and now we have the largest series of autopsies, and the autopsies really are incontrovertible. The patients did die of the vaccine. So, it does blow the government narrative out of the water. They’re going to have to wrestle with this. It garnered tremendous attention, certainly on the internet, social media, and the editorial platforms.”
The findings were published as follows:
“The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”
The paper lays out the methods which included data from 44 papers, containing 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case (post-mortem examination of animal heart tissue).
According to the doctors involved in the publishing of the report, autopsy reports, and necropsy reports published in ScienceDirect and PubMed relating to COVID-19 vaccines through May 18th, 2023 were used, with 326 cases yielding what included a “high likelihood of a causal link” between the vaccines and cause of death. Whether it’s the inactivated virus injections of Sinovac-CoronaVac, Novavax, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, or the messenger RNA Pfizer-BioNTech, many millions of people have accepted the injections into their bodies.
The report reads:
“If a large number of deaths are indeed causally linked to COVID-19 vaccination, the implications could be immense, including: the complete withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the global market, suspension of all remaining COVID-19 vaccine mandates and passports, loss of public trust in government and medical institutions, investigations and inquiries into the censorship, silencing and persecution of doctors and scientists who raised these concerns, and compensation for those who were harmed as a result of the administration of COVID-19 vaccines.”
The introduction to the report states that as of May 31st, 2023, the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) “has infected an estimated 767,364,883 people globally, resulting in 6,938,353 deaths.” Operation Warp Speed is also mentioned in the introduction as having been rolled out just 11 months after the initial identification of the virus itself, with an estimated 69% of the world’s population now having received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccines.
According to the report, the synthesis of the spike glycoprotein (SP) appears to be the likely catalyst for adverse effects present in the studied autopsies.
“SP and/or subunits/peptide fragments can trigger ACE2 receptor degradation and internalization, which may also cause destabilization of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), resulting in possible enhanced inflammation, vasoconstriction, and thrombosis. SP activates platelets, causes endothelial damage, and directly promotes arterial and venous thrombosis. Moreover, immune system cells that have taken up the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) then release them back into the circulation with elevated numbers of exosomes containing SP and microRNAs that play a role in inducing a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites, resulting in severe inflammatory consequences. Further, long-term cancer control may be jeopardized in those injected with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines because of IRF7 and IRF9 suppression. There is a distinct potential of a causal link between SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response, and tumorigenesis”.
The paper also cites over a million adverse events directly associated with the COVID-19 vaccines having been reported to VAERS, or the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. Of those, 35,324 were deaths, 26,928 myocarditis and pericarditis, 19,546 heart attacks, and 8,701 reports of thrombocytopenia (blood clots).
It’s important to note that VAERS does not automatically collect reports. Doctors, nurses, and patients must file their reports manually and voluntarily. It’s safe to say there are more adverse events from vaccines that go unreported than those that are logged into the system for reasons we can all theorize.
What could be considered one of the more disturbing aspects of the report is the average number of days post-COVID-19 vaccine administration was 2 weeks, wherein “most of the deaths occurred within a week from last vaccination.”
The mean age of death in the 325 autopsy cases and 1 necropsy case was 70 years old, with 42.6% being female. One organ system was affected in 302 cases, with 53% of that being the cardiovascular system. Hematological followed at 17%, then respiratory (8%), multiple organ systems (7%), neurological (4%), immunological (3%), and gastrointestinal (1%).
The overall interpretation of the study states:
“The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.”
The reason for its removal from the website remains a matter of speculation. Dr. McCullough also spoke with Naomi Wolf about the removal of the paper on her website Daily Clout. Wolf reads aloud the note that greeted those attempting to view and acquire a copy of the report:
“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
The paper itself had not yet been peer-reviewed at the time of its removal, but according to McCullough that wasn’t used to constitute the paper’s removal. McCullough explains that many preprints are published having not yet been peer-reviewed. The world-renowned cardiologist says after the paper had been signed off on by those involved, it began to go through the submission process. “It was originally submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine, which rejected it after a few days. Then it went to the Journal of the American Medical Association which rejected it in, I believe about an hour or less.”
Wolf asks McCullough about the reason given for the study’s removal to which he answers:
“No reason. Yeah, the journals say ‘It’s not a priority for us.’ It just doesn’t even go out for review. So then it goes to Lancet. Now, you know, at the beginning of the pandemic I published in Lancet. I published in Lancet before as an author, so it’s not uncommon territory for me.
“So it goes to Lancet. Lancet has it for about three days and Lancet agrees to have it go up on the Preprint server, meaning it’s not fully peer-reviewed and then Lancet said, ‘Well, we’re going to triage it to a lower journal.’ And it was almost like a newsletter. It’s called Medical Dialogues. And so we respectfully declined that. And so the full paper is under review now at the American Journal of Medicine, another high-level journal.
“But, the commitment to the Preprint server, which it would have went on the Preprint server anyway, was fine. And so we kept it up on the Preprint server and this got announced. Before we knew it, overnight the downloads of the full manuscript from the Preprint server were by the hundreds per minute. I’ve never seen a manuscript- it was literally flying off the shelf. Because the evidence tables are so detailed on every death. I think there’s 28 pages total of evidence tables, and so it was literally flying off the shelf at Lancet, all over social media.
“And then this morning we got a notice that you read that said, well we’re taking it down, because they said the conclusions are not supported by the methodology. Methodology, you know, we lay it out. It’s a standard search methodology. I’ve done this my whole career. Standard adjudication and ultimately agreement. And again, it’s autopsies. There’s not too much to disagree with. The autopsies show a blood clot, they show heart damage.
“So, the interesting thing that occurred though, if the Lancet had done nothing this would have been on the Preprint server, the paper would be published elsewhere, and honestly wouldn’t have gained the notoriety that it’s gained. So now, this is all over the world. People are basically crying out, ‘medical censorship’ by Lancet. And the question is, who called Lancet? Who actually raised objection to have Lancet do this overnight?”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) remain in full denial of the COVID-19 vaccines having directly caused death, though their website goes into detail about different adverse events from the vaccines including Anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Myocarditis and Pericarditis, and Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), claiming all to be “rare”.
According to the CDC, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) has been observed to occur more frequently with the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine than with the mRNA versions. They make reference to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) concerning the GBS reports following vaccination. The study points out that these cases have been observed within a timeframe of 21 to 42 days after receiving the vaccine.
Again, the CDC reports a casual relationship between Johnson & Johnson’s version of the COVID-19 vaccine for reports of TTS, above that of the mRNA versions.
As to deaths being directly associated with taking COVID-19 vaccines the CDC states, “People receiving COVID-19 vaccines are less likely to die from COVID-19 and its complications and are at no greater risk of death from non-COVID causes, than unvaccinated people.”
Dr. McCullough provided an explanation for his belief that the vaccines had the most significant impact on the cardiovascular system, based on the evidence presented.
“The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), when they are taken up by human somatic cells, that is non-reproductive cells, so that would be heart tissue, other organs. They cause what is called syncytia formation. They actually cause the cell membranes to fuse together. Now, the heart is avid for lipids. The skeletal muscles use about 80% glucose and 20% lipid as their fuel. In the heart, it’s just the opposite. It’s 80% lipid, 20% glucose.
“So the heart may preferentially take up lipid nanoparticles more than other tissues. Of interest, athletes are always exercising so myocardial blood flow draws more of these particles into the heart for the periods of exercise. Then on top of that, we know that the messenger RNA (mRNA) on the lipid nanoparticles is circulatory in the body at least a month.
“So we think that exercise in athletes, because we hear a disproportionate amount of athletes going down and they shouldn’t go down, right? So they’ve all been checked out ahead of time, EKG, ECHO, we know they’re good to go so the only thing that’s changed in life is the vaccine.”
In addition to this study, Dr. McCullough also recently revealed on Infowars that the cancer-promoting segment of DNA, SV40 has been found in the vaccines. The Vigilant Fox posted the video on Twitter, along with the following transcript:
𝗗𝗿. 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵: "Besides variation in the amount of messenger RNA in it [COVID shots], there's contamination with cDNA. These are little fragments of DNA that come off the manufacturing process. And one of them, Alex, you're not going to believe this, is SV40. SV40 is a known cancer-promoting segment of DNA. And yes, they're in the shots."
𝗔𝗹𝗲𝘅 𝗝𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀: "I'm not a scientist like you and a famous published person, but I know that mainline news reports that many cancers — I saw federal documents. They estimated 98 million Americans had cancer or related cancer from SV40. contamination in the 50s, 60s, and 70s with live polio. Explain what SV40 or Simian Virus 40 is and how big a deal it is that you just said. And I've been seeing this in the literature now that SV40 is in there."
𝗗𝗿. 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵: "SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body. To make matters worse, the spike protein, the S2 segment in a paper from University of Pittsburgh by Singh and colleagues. It impairs the tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA. What I'm telling you is the shots promote cancer through SV40, and they inhibit our ability to fight cancer by suppressing the tumor suppressor system. So now this is looking very bad. Every system is showing cancer rates are up. So, that's inarguable. The big question is, how much of this is due to the vaccines?"
Building upon McCullough's recent discoveries regarding SV40, Dr. Ryan Cole engaged in a conversation with Jan Jekielek from American Thought Leaders in October 2022. During the interview, he expressed his belief that the rise in cancer cases can be attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines. Dr. Cole discussed the discovery of "foot-long clots" in patients after vaccination, and also expressed concern about cancer rates surging rapidly “like wildfire”.
According to Dr. Cole, he is aware of numerous doctors who have treated cancer patients experiencing long periods of remission, but after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and subsequent booster shots, their cancer resurfaced.
Also mentioned in the American Thought Leaders interview is the Substack of
who has meticulously documented the manipulation of CDC data concerning COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths with exceptional detail.Among the publications by The Ethical Skeptic, In Houston, The CDC Has A Problem, the author discusses the use of the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) by the CDC as having “provided an opportunity for the CDC to develop mechanisms to conceal Sudden Adult Deaths and Cancer Deaths (see Exhibit 1B below), and ironically only served to degrade the externally observable overall function and performance of the NCHS/State to CDC reporting process.”
Further, the author states, “A paradox exists with regard to sudden young person and adult cardiac or anomalous deaths observable since mid-2021. Tens of thousands of cases of young persons dying suddenly in their sleep, or after a sporting event, are belied by a purported reduction in sudden cardiac death claimed by the CDC and pharmaceutical industry trolls, since the NVSS System Upgrade (see Exhibit 3B top panel).”
The general public is left with scanty, distorted data sets, and perhaps their own anecdotal experiences of friends or loved ones allegedly harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines. Over time, an increasing number of health issues allegedly linked to vaccines have caught the attention of medical professionals. However, many of these doctors claim to have faced censorship, preventing them from openly discussing their findings during the pandemic. Instead of being supported and having their information amplified, they have been met with skepticism and criticism.
Since the emergence of the initial COVID-19 case, the discourse surrounding the pandemic has leaned heavily towards the mantra of "Trust the science," while often neglecting the crucial aspect of thoroughly analyzing the available data. Unfortunately, this prevailing mindset has been deemed the epitome of "Wrong Speak" in our present society.
SHOCKING: COVID-19 Vaccines Linked to Disturbing Autopsy Results - Stunning Lancet Study Removed Within 24 Hours
Wayback lost it, so here's another backup: https://zenodo.org/record/8120771