6 Comments
Mar 15Liked by Dr Alaric Naudé

I am not a Christian but I find his lies & equivocation deeply offensive. ‘Pederast’ is putting it mildly; he has no place in decent discourse. Will post this on X. Thank you for this.

Expand full comment
author

My pleasure. Thank you for taking the time to read my work.

Expand full comment
Mar 18Liked by Dr Alaric Naudé

Dr Alaric,

I really enjoyed reading your response.

I also read Peters article. The one thing I can truly say about Peter's positions, is that no claim made can be verified as one hundred percent accurate. Is anyone alive to actually verify Peters claims or Peter's Hypothesis No ? Was there any actual proof to back up his claims, no. To give creedence to his statement.

No I really dont think so. None that I have ever seen. None that have been put forth in any reputable historical journal. Any Recognized Reputable Religious Studies Organization.

Expand full comment
Mar 17Liked by Dr Alaric Naudé

You should challenge him on his 1997 letters saying pedos are okay. Obviously I’m paraphrasing but he’s a scumbag.

Expand full comment
author

Oh theres so much more than just that. He wrote very fondly of the leader of PIE in the UK

Expand full comment
Mar 17Liked by Dr Alaric Naudé

I know he’s done a lot but I read soooo much on here that it’s hard to keep up 😂😂

Expand full comment